If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?

Freedom of speech does not apply to:

HIPAA violations

Perjury

Consequatur explicabo natus minima expedita.

Revenge porn

Insider trading

Insurrection

How old is planet Earth? Is it 4.5 billion years old or 6,000 years old?

Revealing classified information

Child pornography

Threats of violence

Now that Nigel has imploded his centre right U.K. Reform Party, in a fit of capricious impulse, do we have a credible alternative other than the RIGHT WING Rupert Lowe M.P. to save the impoverished British from the multicultural `benefits hugging`?

You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

And much, much more.

Trade secrets

The First in 30 Years: Scientists Discover New Class of Antibiotics - SciTechDaily

That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.

Fraud

If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Hims & Hers Stock Drops More Than 30% After Novo Nordisk Breakup - WSJ

Terroristic threats

False advertising

You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

Should Kick Streaming buy TikTok so that TikTok can allow jerks to not get banned but instead promoted due to poor behavior like is the case with Kick already?

Conspiracy

No freedom is absolute.